<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="https://publishpress.com/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Check out the all new look of the Aegis Group series!	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://sidneybristol.com/2016/11/07/check-out-the-all-new-look-of-the-aegis-group-series/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://sidneybristol.com/2016/11/07/check-out-the-all-new-look-of-the-aegis-group-series/</link>
	<description>NYT &#38; USA Today Bestselling Author</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2016 20:59:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Pansy Petal		</title>
		<link>https://sidneybristol.com/2016/11/07/check-out-the-all-new-look-of-the-aegis-group-series/#comment-67432</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pansy Petal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2016 20:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidneybristol.com/?p=9344#comment-67432</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Um . . . yeah! I can get behind - in front off - to the side of - ah well . . . I like these covers. *wiping a bit of drool off the keyboard* I agree Dangerous Attraction has some mighty buns. However, Dangerous Protector just plain stalled my scroll. *sigh* 

I too liked the old covers. But then, I rarely buy a book for the cover, but because I like the author and/or the blurb. However, I can see how sales may increase with these covers. They do grab attention. If I didn&#039;t already have all of these . . . *grin* 

Thank you for the lovelies to look at. Nice! *going back to drooling now*]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um . . . yeah! I can get behind &#8211; in front off &#8211; to the side of &#8211; ah well . . . I like these covers. *wiping a bit of drool off the keyboard* I agree Dangerous Attraction has some mighty buns. However, Dangerous Protector just plain stalled my scroll. *sigh* </p>
<p>I too liked the old covers. But then, I rarely buy a book for the cover, but because I like the author and/or the blurb. However, I can see how sales may increase with these covers. They do grab attention. If I didn&#8217;t already have all of these . . . *grin* </p>
<p>Thank you for the lovelies to look at. Nice! *going back to drooling now*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
